Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has underlined the need to evaluate cognitive profile via videoconferencing (teleneuropsychology, TeleNP) as a suitable alternative to face-to-face assessment (F-F).

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and the reliability of Rao's Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Tests (R-BRB) remote administration in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS).

Methods: Sixty PwMS underwent R-BRB in two conditions: F-F and TeleNP, 1 month apart.

Results: Cognitive test performance was similar, regardless of the administration type, but visuospatial test performance was better in F-F.

Conclusion: These data suggest that TeleNP is feasible and highly reliable in MS clinical practice.

Keywords: Multiple sclerosis; cognitive impairment; neuropsychological assessment; teleneuropsychology.

Abstract

Background: The Brief International Cognitive Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (BICAMS) is the most widely used screening tool for cognitive impairment in Multiple Sclerosis (MS). However, the administration and scoring procedures of the paper version are time consuming and prone to errors. Aim of our study was to develop a tablet version of BICAMS (iBICAMS), and to assess its reliability compared to the paper version.

Methods: We administered both BICAMS and iBICAMS to 139 MS patients in two different sessions. We compared scores on both versions using a paired t-test. We used a repeated measures ANOVA to test the impact of rater, order of administration and test-retest time on test-retest performances. We used the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) to assess the reliability between BICAMS and iBICAMS.

Results: All three sub-tests of the BICAMS (SDMT, CVLT-II and BVMT-R) were different between the paper and the tablet versions. Order of administration influenced test-retest performances at the SDMT (p<0.001), CVLT- II (p<0.001) and BVMT-R (p<0.001). Intraclass coefficient correlation (ICC) revealed a high level of agreement between the paper BICAMS and the iPad version for all three tests: SDMT (0.92), CVLT-II (0.83) and BVMT-R (0.82).

Conclusions: We found a high reliability between BICAMS and iBICAMS. Considering the inherent advantages of automated scoring, digital storage of data, standardized timing, the iBICAMS could become a standard in clinical practice.

Keywords: BICAMS; Cognitive impairment; Multiple sclerosis (MS); Neuropsychological assessment.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Some studies have shown that air pollution, often assessed by thin particulate matter with diameter below 2.5 µg/m3 (PM2.5), may contribute to severe COVID-19 courses, as well as play a role in the onset and evolution of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the impact of air pollution on COVID-19 has never been explored specifically amongst patients with MS (PwMS). This retrospective observational study aims to explore associations between PM2.5 and COVID-19 severity amongst PwMS.

Methods: Data were retrieved from an Italian web-based platform (MuSC-19) which includes PwMS with COVID-19. PM2.5 2016-2018 average concentrations were provided by the Copernicus Atmospheric Monitoring Service. Italian patients inserted in the platform from 15 January 2020 to 9 April 2021 with a COVID-19 positive test were included. Ordered logistic regression models were used to study associations between PM2.5 and COVID-19 severity.

Results: In all, 1087 patients, of whom 13% required hospitalization and 2% were admitted to an intensive care unit or died, were included. Based on the multivariate analysis, higher concentrations of PM2.5 increased the risk of worse COVID-19 course (odds ratio 1.90; p = 0.009).

Conclusions: Even if several other factors explain the unfavourable course of COVID-19 in PwMS, the role of air pollutants must be considered and further investigated.

Keywords: air pollution; coronavirus; multiple sclerosis.

Abstract

Introduction: The diagnosis of the progression phase of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is still retrospective and based on the objectivation of clinical disability accumulation.

Objectives: To assess whether the Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) scores predict the occurrence of disease progression within three years of follow-up.

Methods: Observational prospective multicenter study. Stable Relapsing-Remitting MS (RRMS) patients were enrolled. At enrollment, patients completed the following PROMs: Beck Depression Inventory- II, The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medications, Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36- Item (SF36), Fatigue Severity Scale. EDSS was assessed at enrollment and three years later. The outcome measure was defined as the occurrence of confirmed disability progression (CDP) within three years of follow-up. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were performed to study the association between the final score of each test and the outcome.

Results: SF36-Physical Functioning (SF36-PF) was the only independent variable associated with the outcome. The ROC curve analysis determined a score of 77.5 at SF36-PF as the cut-off point identifying patients experiencing CDP within three years of follow-up [AUC: 0.66 (95% CI: 0.56-0.75)].

Conclusions: RRMS patients scoring higher (>77.5) at SF36-PF subscale have a higher likelihood to experience CDP within the next three years.

Keywords: Disability assessment; Disability progression; Multiple sclerosis; PROMs; PROs.

Abstract

Objective: Cladribine tablets were tested against placebo in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In this study, the effectiveness of cladribine vs other approved drugs in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) was compared by matching RCT to observational data.

Methods: Data from the pivotal trial assessing cladribine tablets vs placebo (CLARITY) were propensity score matched to data from the Italian multicenter database i-MuST. This database included 3,150 patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2018 at 24 Italian MS centers who started a disease-modifying drug. The annualized relapse rate (ARR) over 2 years from treatment start and the 24-week confirmed disability progression were compared between patients treated with cladribine and other approved drugs (interferon, glatiramer acetate, fingolimod, natalizumab, and dimethyl fumarate), with comparisons with placebo as a reference. Treatment effects were estimated by the inverse probability weighting negative binomial regression model for ARR and Cox model for disability progression. The treatment effect has also been evaluated according to baseline disease activity.

Results: All weighted baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups. All drugs tested had an effect vs placebo close to that detected in the RCT. Patients treated with cladribine had a significantly lower ARR compared with interferon (relapse ratio [RR] = 0.48; p < 0.001), glatiramer acetate (RR = 0.49; p < 0.001), and dimethyl fumarate (RR = 0.6; p = 0.001); a similar ARR to that with fingolimod (RR = 0.74; p = 0.24); and a significantly higher ARR than natalizumab (RR = 2.13; p = 0.014), confirming results obtained by indirect treatment comparisons from RCTs (network meta-analyses). The relative effect of cladribine tablets 10 mg (cumulative dose 3.5 mg/kg over 2 years) was higher in patients with high disease activity vs all treatments except fingolimod and natalizumab. Effects on disability progression were largely nonsignificant, probably due to lack of power for such analysis.

Conclusion: In patients with RRMS, cladribine tablets showed lower ARR compared with matched patients who started interferon, glatiramer acetate, or dimethyl fumarate; was similar to fingolimod; and was higher than natalizumab. The beneficial effect of cladribine tablets was generally amplified in the subgroup of patients with high disease activity.

Classification of evidence: This study provides Class III evidence that for patients with RRMS, cladribine-treated patients had lower ARR compared with interferon, glatiramer acetate, or dimethyl fumarate; similar ARR compared with fingolimod; and higher ARR compared with natalizumab.

Abstract

Background: The mental representation of the body (or body representation, BR) derives from the processing of multiple sensory and motor inputs and plays a crucial role in guiding our actions and in how we perceive our body. Fundamental inputs for BR construction come also from the interoceptive systems which refer to the whole bidirectional processes between the brain and the body. People with Multiple sclerosis (MS) show an abnormal multisensory integration which may compromise BR and interoception integrity. However, no study has evaluated possible deficits on distinct and dissociable dimensions of body representation (i.e., action-oriented, aBR; and a nonaction-oriented body representation, NaBR) and interoception (i.e., interoceptive accuracy, interoceptive sensibility, and interoceptive awareness) in MS.

Objective: In the present study, we aimed to determine whether participants with MS present changes in BR and interoceptive dimensions.

Methods: We performed comparison analyses on tasks and questionnaires tapping all BR and interoceptive dimensions between 36 people with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and 42 healthy controls, and between 23 people with progressive MS (PMS) and 33 healthy controls.

Results: Overall, patients with MS exhibited lower interoceptive accuracy than matched controls. The RRMS group also showed higher visceral interoceptive sensibility levels. No differences were found in BR accuracy measures, but the PMS reported longer response times when performing the aBR task.

Conclusion: These findings open a new issue on the role of inner-signal monitoring in the body symptomatology of MS and highlight the need for an accurate BR and interoceptive assessment in a clinical setting.

Keywords: Action-oriented body representation; Interoception; Multiple sclerosis; Non-action-oriented body representation.

Abstract

Background: In the general population, maternal COVID-19 is associated with worse maternal and fetal outcomes. Two previous studies have assessed COVID-19 clinical outcomes in pregnant women with multiple sclerosis (MS), but there are no data about maternal and fetal outcomes.

Objectives: In this multicenter study, we aimed to assess maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with MS and COVID-19 infection.

Methods: We recruited pregnant patients with MS who contracted COVID-19 and were followed up in Italian and Turkish Centers, during 2020-2022. A control group was extracted from a previous Italian cohort. Associations between group (COVID-19 or healthy patients) and clinical outcomes (maternal complications, fetal malformations, and spontaneous abortion) were investigated with a weighted logistic regression where propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) approach was applied for adjusting for difference in baseline confounders.

Results: In the multivariable analysis, COVID-19 during pregnancy was associated with a higher risk of maternal complications (odd ratio (OR) = 2.12; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.32-3.48; p = 0.002), while it was not associated with higher risk of spontaneous abortion and fetal malformations.

Conclusion: Our data indicate that COVID-19 during pregnancy increases the risk of maternal complications, while it seems to have no significant impact on fetal outcomes.

Keywords: COVID-19; Multiple sclerosis; SARS-CoV-2 infection; fetal outcomes; maternal outcomes; pregnancy.

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common disabling neurological disease characterized by chronic inflammation and neuronal cell viability impairment. Based on previous studies reporting that adiponectin exhibits neuroprotective effects in some models of neurodegenerative diseases, we analyzed the effects of AdipoRon treatment, alone or in combination with the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with MS (MS-CSF), to verify whether this adipokine acts on the basal neuronal cellular processes. To this aim, SH-SY5Y and U-87 cells (models of neuronal and glial cells, respectively) were exposed to MS-CSF alone or in co-treatment with AdipoRon. The cell viability was determined via MTT assay, and the possible underlying mechanisms were investigated via the alterations of oxidative stress and inflammation. MTT assay confirmed that AdipoRon alone did not affect the viability of both cell lines; whereas, when used in combination with MS-CSF, it reduces MS-CSF inhibitory effects on the viability of both SH-SY5Y and U-87 cell lines. In addition, MS-CSF treatment causes an increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines, whereas it determines the reduction in anti-inflammatory IL-10. Interestingly, the co-administration of AdipoRon counteracts the MS-CSF-induced production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, whereas it determines an enhancement of IL-10. In conclusion, our data suggest that AdipoRon counteracts the cytotoxic effects induced by MS-CSF on SH-SY5Y and U-87 cell lines and that one of the potential molecular underlying mechanisms might occur via reduction in oxidative stress and inflammation. Further in vivo and in vitro studies are essential to confirm whether adiponectin could be a neuro-protectant candidate against neuronal cell injury.

Keywords: adiponectin; glial and neuronal cells; inflammation; multiple sclerosis; oxidative stress.

Abstract

Introduction: Ozanimod is a new-generation sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) modulator, approved for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS), offering higher selectivity for S1P receptor 1 and 5 (SPR1-5), minimizing potential safety concerns related to S1P3 receptor activation, compared to fingolimod.

Objectives: We aimed to compare the adherence and persistence on treatment in MS patients switched to ozanimod from fingolimod for safety reasons (mainly lymphopenia or liver enzymes increase).

Methods: We retrospectively recruited patients treated with fingolimod who switched to ozanimod for safety reasons, with at least 12 months of follow-up. We collected demographic, clinical, biochemistry, and safety data during fingolimod and after switching to ozanimod to evaluate (1) lymphocytes and liver enzymes dynamics, (2) persistence on ozanimod over 6 months, (3) proportion of patients with no adverse events (NADE) on ozanimod and no evidence of disease activity (NEDA-3).

Results: We recruited 60 relapsing-remitting MS patients (mean age of 42 ± 7.9 years) who were treated with fingolimod for an average of 5.7 years (61.6% female) and switched to ozanimod due to lymphopenia (70%) or hypertransaminasemia (21.6%). A total of 58/60 (96%) patients persisted on treatment with ozanimod for a mean of 1.50 ± 0.49 years; mean lymphocyte count increased from 0.39 to 0.56 (p = 0.025) in patients who switched due to lymphopenia; hypertransaminasemia decreased from 21.6% in fingolimod to 9.3% in ozanimod. NADE was recorded in 93% patients during ozanimod treatment and NEDA-3 in 88.3% of patients after 1 year. Overall, patients with complete control of disease (NEDA) in the absence of adverse events (NADE) were 83.7% (NEDA3/NADE).

Discussion and conclusion: Our findings suggest that switching from fingolimod to ozanimod may mitigate lymphopenia or hypertransaminasemia and ameliorate effectiveness on disease activity.

Keywords: fingolimod; multiple sclerosis; ozanimod; relapsing–remitting MS.

Abstract

Background: Clinicians struggle to timely diagnose secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis (SP-MS), with a 'transition phase' period of diagnostic uncertainty. We aimed at defining clinical markers predicting evolution to SP-MS.

Methods: We reviewed 210 newly diagnosed MS patients experiencing at least one confirmed disability worsening (CDW). CDWs were classified as disability worsening either due to incomplete recovery following relapse (r-CDW), or independent of relapse activity (nr-CDW). Logistic regression and Cox regression models were used to evaluate variables at CDW associated with SP-MS diagnosis.

Results: On CDW, higher EDSS (OR: 2.73, p=0.002) and nr-CDW (OR: 2.63, p=0.03) were associated with conversion to SP-MS over the follow-up. In addition, the risk of SP-MS was higher in patients with EDSS>3.0 at CDW (HR: 2.26, p<0.001), and with time to second CDW <24 months (HR: 0.98, p<0.001), compared with patients that experienced a CDW but did not receive SP-MS diagnosis (AUC: 0.95, Sensitivity: 0.83, Specificity: 0.96).

Conclusion: At their first CDW, patients with higher EDSS, experiencing CDW without relapse and developing a further CDW within 2 years are at higher risk of SP-MS conversion. This provides proxies for conversion to SP-MS since first episode of CDW.

Keywords: Progressive multiple sclerosis; biomarker; disability; multiple sclerosis; predictor.